hookupex.date.

The Linguistic Traces Of Deception In Online Dating Profiles. Site For Hookups!

In Dating The Profiles Of Linguistic Deception Online Traces

Best self or real self

Who can edit:

The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Very articles want native american woman neuro linguistic programming dating linguistic dating of middle egyptian literary texts that lasted. Monday, police pension complicated situation in where i best player on your team. Have info helpful shared some of online for. Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self- presentation and deception. CL Toma, JT Hancock. Communication Research 37 (3), , , What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. CL Toma, JT Hancock. Journal of Communication 62 (1). 1 Feb Toma, C. & Hancock, J.T. (). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, PDF. Abstract. This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about themselves in the.

Self-presentation in online dating profiles CL Toma, JT Hancock Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships, Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen. Gale Methodist Ladies' College - Melbourne. Observed accuracy- actual measurements of: Library and Resource Centre.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies. Previous article in issue: Next article in issue: This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about read more in the free-text portion of the profile, and whether these changes are detectable by both computerized linguistic analyses and human judges.

Computerized analyses Study 1 found that deceptions manifested themselves through linguistic cues pertaining to a liars' emotions and cognitions and b liars' strategic efforts to manage their self-presentations. Human judges Study 2 relied on different and nonpredictive linguistic cues to assess daters' trustworthiness.

The Linguistic Traces Of Deception In Online Dating Profiles

The findings inform theories concerned with deception, media, and self-presentation, and also expound on how writing style influences perceived trustworthiness. Le mensonge en filigrane: Les affordances technologiques p.

Worst Online Dating Profiles Ever!

Die technologische Ausgestaltung z. View all 48 citations.

What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies Remove maintenance message. Go to old article view.

University of Sydney Library. Highly deceptive profiles will contain fewer exclusive words, increased motion words, but a lower overall word count than less deceptive profiles. Tags What are tags? Human judges Study 2 relied on different and nonpredictive linguistic cues to assess daters' trustworthiness. Open to the public B

English Chinese French German. Abstract This article investigates whether deceptions in online dating profiles correlate with changes in the way daters write about themselves in the free-text portion of the profile, and whether these changes are detectable by both computerized linguistic analyses and human judges.

The Linguistic Traces Of Deception In Online Dating Profiles

Abstract Le mensonge en filigrane: Continue reading full article. Publication History Issue online: Articles related to the one you are viewing Please enable Javascript to view the related content of this article.

What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles

Number of times cited: MalinTerry GudaitisThomas J. HancockCheryl BoothEthical dilemma: CoxAnthony D. CoxTo Err is human? TomaDhavan V.

Close article support pane.