How to Date a Dead Thing
What are the pros and cons of Carbon dating? | Yahoo Answers
The main con is that it is only accurate on things that are less than , years old (about 10 carbon half-lives). Also, some things can accumulate carbon over time, which can skew the results somewhat. I guess the main pro would be that it allows us to date stuff with carbon in it to a fairly accurate. In particular, radiocarbon dating works to find ages as old as 50, years but not much older. Using it to date older items will give bad results. Samples can be contaminated with younger or older carbon, again invalidating the results. Because of excess 12C released into the atmosphere from the Industrial. Carbon 14 (C14) is an isotope of carbon with an extra 2 neutrons. It is radioactive , so after 5, years half of an original sample will have decayed into other elements. New C14 is constantly being created by cosmic rays interacting with CO2 in the upper atmosphere, and thus the amount of C14 in the.
Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members, show more. Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, show more.
Is carbon dating accurate? Since we have only been able to study it for x amount of years, how can it be sure that there is no rapid What Is Carbon Dating Yahoo Answers of decay and that it stays consistant. Like a car rolling down a slope, it starts slowly than speeds up, how to say it is consistant. I am bothered by the fact I am bothered by the fact that it is used to dismount theories, when it is itself a theory without being proven. Are you sure you want to delete this answer?
The Nobel prize in chemistry was given for showing that it hits known age samples consistently.
The method is MUCH better than it was then. Half lives are half lives. The most accurate clocks we make are based on the constant decay rate they have consistently shown. Is Carbon Dating Accurate. Carbon dating is accurate within several percent for about seven or eight half-lives of carbon Other isotopic dating HAS been tested.
We know for an absolute fact that radioactive decay operates on a statistically predictable way. We've tested this with short half-lives and have made at least some tests based on longer half-lives. It has been proven many times by various means including comparison to other methods of date measurement. For instance, taking extracts from old tree trunks where we can count rings to get an approximation of tree age.
How Does The Carbon Dating Work?
For the oldest trees, carbon-dating has been shown to work. Geologic sedimentation rates strong corroborate radioactive dating. The remarkable consistency of samples from places all around the world also speaks to the reliability of the decay process.
You are throwing up a smoke screen due to your lack of knowledge. Go get an education before you show people what else you didn't learn in school.
How would you know? It's trying to answer questions that have no known answer! I'll give you an example. Let's say that someone comes up with a new mathematical model to calculate the length of a shadow based on the angle of the sun.
Is carbon dating accurate? These indicate the mass of the atom — the number of protons plus neutrons. Samples can be contaminated with younger or older carbon, again invalidating the results.
Either it's easier or it's harder. So, there's no checking your work! There's no checking the theory for accuracy! It could be right, it could be off by 5 or 10 percent, or it could be off by almost 4.
I've heard two sides, which is true? Carbon is readily accesable and doesn't usually order the lobster and champagne. Carbon dating is BS and is proven as such, but why do scientists continue to peddle this as an accurate way to? Why does Jesus allow all these school shooting murders? Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, show more.
But a lot of people like to pretend they do. There is actual real evidence that man lived with dinosaurs, but the scientist do not want to accept it as truth. Scientifically dated artifacts, art and cave drawing of dinosaurs have been discovered that were dated before any know fossils where discovered. There is also footprints of dinosaur fossils beside man footprints that they want to try and dismiss as a hoax, when it fact it is truth.
Carbon dating is flawed and the ring tree is not proof enough of it's accuracy. There have been ring trees discovered beneath layers of sedimentary rock that suggest erosion happened at a very fast pace, but again the scientist do not want to accept that either. Do they all confirm what another says as well? With all the methods, do they all say the exact same thing as to the day and date or years of link it is?
Mostly, but I hope you do realize that carbon dating is just one out of dozens of dating methods. Radioactive decay is stable and does not change.
Carbon dating yahoo answers · GitBook
If this was false, nuclear power plants would be melting down all over the place. Nuclear Physics isn't a theory Decay rates aren't a theory. Get an MBA while working. Related Questions How is carbon dating accurate? Why isn't carbon dating accurate? Answer Questions Do christians ever try to convert normal people with their nonsense? Why does Jesus allow all these school shooting murders?
Which is the most important christian virtue and which is the deadliest Sin? Which one of these do you really need to survive. God or the Sun? Religion- On judgement day, do we the righteous get to watch the suffering of the non-believer? Why do christians always deny the violence ordered by their god?
Explain Carbon Dating in 50 words? | Yahoo Answers
Friends, how do u ascertain the existence of God? After what Jesus did for us, does God really forget our sins and remember them no more? Christians, why can't you prove anything you say?